In Rangpur, members of the July fighters and families of martyrs have expressed fear after Awami League leaders and activists, whose activities were previously banned, allegedly began threatening plaintiffs and witnesses following their release on bail. The families claim that these individuals, accused in murder and sedition cases, are moving freely and issuing warnings to those involved in the cases. They also accuse the police of remaining inactive despite repeated complaints.

According to local sources, several Awami League leaders in Gangachara, Pirgacha, and Badarganj upazilas are openly engaging in political activities and intimidating witnesses. Allegations suggest that some police officers and BNP leaders are supporting or overlooking these actions, allowing the accused to operate publicly. Concerns have grown that this situation could lead to serious incidents if arrests are not made.

Police officials, including the Rangpur Metropolitan Police Commissioner and the DIG of Rangpur Range, stated that law enforcement will act according to legal directives and that no offenders will be spared. Civil society representatives and university academics have urged authorities to arrest those involved in the July violence.

US President Donald Trump has threatened to continue war indefinitely amid ongoing US and Israeli attacks on Iran. In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday night, Trump said the United States has enough weapons to fight forever, responding to expert discussions suggesting US stockpiles were running low. The conflict, now in its fifth day, has already left over a thousand people dead in Iran, with additional casualties reported in Lebanon and across the region.

Iran has reportedly launched missiles toward Turkey and Saudi Arabia, attacked a major Aramco refinery, and claimed full control of the Strait of Hormuz. The US confirmed sinking an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka, killing 80, while Iran retaliated with missile strikes on Israel and US bases in Qatar. Tehran has postponed the state funeral of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in earlier strikes.

Iranian officials declared readiness for a prolonged war and rejected further talks with Washington. Meanwhile, Israel warned that whoever succeeds Khamenei will be targeted if hostile actions continue, signaling an escalation with no clear end in sight.

The Arab League has condemned Iran’s attacks on neighboring Arab countries, describing them as a clear violation of international law. In a statement issued on Wednesday, Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit said the assaults not only breach international law but also strike at the fundamental principles of good neighborly relations.

Gheit added that Iran’s aggression has created an unprecedented hostility between Tehran and Arab nations, which could have a profound impact on future relations among these states. He emphasized that while Arab countries recognize the internal crisis Iran is facing, such challenges cannot justify attacks on any sovereign state.

The statement underscores growing regional tension following the reported Iranian strikes, with the Arab League warning of long-term consequences for diplomatic and security dynamics in the Middle East.

Iran has sharply criticized US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, calling him the 'Minister of War Crimes'. The statement came from Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei, who made the remarks in a social media post citing Hegseth’s public comments. According to Baghaei, Hegseth had said that US and Israeli warplanes were flying over Tehran, bringing death and destruction from the skies.

Baghaei described Hegseth’s words as an admission of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He further stated that only a 'Nazi mentality' could coldly unleash death and destruction on another nation merely to fulfill a leader’s wishes. The comments were reported by Al Jazeera.

The exchange comes amid reports of heavy attacks on Tehran and significant civilian displacement, with the UNHCR noting that around 100,000 people left the city within the first two days of the assault.

A majority of members in the United States Senate have expressed support for President Donald Trump’s military campaign against Iran. They voted to block a bipartisan proposal that sought to require congressional authorization for any further military action against Iran and to halt aerial combat operations. According to Al Jazeera, the Senate voted 52 against and 47 in favor of the measure, preventing it from advancing.

The blocked proposal, known as the War Powers Resolution, aimed to restrict the president’s ability to engage in hostilities without congressional approval. If passed, it would have required the withdrawal of US forces from ongoing operations in Iran unless Congress explicitly authorized them. Similar attempts had been made previously but also failed to pass.

The Senate’s decision effectively maintains the president’s authority to continue military actions in Iran without new congressional approval, leaving the scope of future operations unchanged for now.

Iran has accused the United States and Israel of carrying out recent airstrikes that damaged numerous civilian facilities across several Iranian cities. According to the Iranian Foreign Ministry, at least 33 sites, including hospitals, schools, residential areas, and markets, were targeted. The ministry’s spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, stated on social media that civilian infrastructure such as schools and hospitals had been deliberately chosen as targets.

The list of affected locations includes residential buildings in Tehran’s Niloufar Square, hospitals in Tehran and Ahvaz, Tehran’s Grand Bazaar, the historic Golestan Palace complex south of the capital, and a primary school in Minab. Additional sites reportedly hit include residential areas in Maragheh and a sports hall in Lamard, Fars Province. Iran also claimed that civilian casualties occurred during the attacks.

Iranian officials said they have evidence of 33 targeted sites but noted that neither the United States nor Israel has yet issued an immediate response to the allegations.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has warned of 'terrorist activity' near the Iraq border, as reports emerge of a ground operation by Kurdish-Iranian militias in Iran’s northwestern region. The claim of the operation has not yet been officially confirmed by any side.

Araghchi has reportedly spoken with Bafel Talabani, leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, while U.S. President Donald Trump also held a conversation with Talabani earlier this week. According to Axios journalist Barak Ravid, a U.S. official said that Kurdish-Iranian militias had launched a ground offensive in northwestern Iran. However, Al Jazeera has not independently verified this information.

Despite the lack of confirmation, indications of possible military activity in Iran’s western region are reportedly increasing, suggesting heightened tensions along the Iran-Iraq border.

Iran has warned that it could target Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility if the United States and Israel attempt to change the Iranian government. The warning was issued by an Iranian military official, according to the country’s semi-official ISNA news agency, and reported by Al Jazeera. The statement specifically mentioned the Dimona site in southern Israel as a potential target.

The Dimona facility, located in Israel’s Negev desert, is widely regarded as the center of the country’s nuclear program. For many years, it has been considered a key site for Israel’s nuclear research and capabilities. The Iranian warning highlights ongoing tensions between Tehran and both Washington and Tel Aviv over regional security and political influence.

The report did not include any immediate response from Israel or the United States, leaving uncertainty about how the warning might affect future diplomatic or military developments.

Most Americans oppose a U.S. military strike on Iran, according to several recent surveys reported by Al Jazeera. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 43 percent of respondents opposed such an attack, while only about one-quarter supported a joint U.S.-Israel operation. The survey, conducted over the weekend, included more than 1,200 American adults.

A separate CNN-commissioned SSRS poll, conducted between February 28 and March 1, showed even stronger opposition, with about six in ten Americans rejecting military action against Iran. In that poll, 41 percent supported the move. Around 60 percent of respondents said President Donald Trump lacked a clear plan for handling the Iran situation, and 39 percent believed the U.S. had not pursued sufficient diplomatic efforts before considering force.

Both polls revealed sharp political divisions: 82 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of independents opposed the strike, compared with only 23 percent of Republicans expressing opposition.

The United States offered Iran a joint civilian nuclear program before launching a military attack, according to White House spokesperson Caroline Levitt. Speaking to reporters, Levitt said President Donald Trump’s negotiators engaged with Tehran in good faith, but Iran rejected the proposals. The offers reportedly included lifting economic sanctions, supplying nuclear fuel for peaceful use, and establishing a US-funded joint civilian nuclear initiative. In return, Iran would have had to dismantle its uranium enrichment infrastructure permanently.

However, Oman’s foreign minister, who mediated the talks, presented a different account. He claimed Iran had agreed to make significant concessions on its nuclear program and that the US attack occurred while negotiations were still ongoing. Observers expressed concern that the situation could heighten regional tensions.

The conflicting narratives from Washington and Muscat highlight uncertainty over the final stages of the talks and the motivations behind the US strike on Iran.

Six days after the joint Israel–United States attack on Iran, uncertainty persists over why President Donald Trump initiated the war and what he aims to achieve. Initially, Trump and his administration said the goal was to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. Vice President JD Vance stated that the U.S. would ensure Iran never acquires nuclear weapons. Later, Trump shifted his reasoning, citing regime change and the elimination of Iran’s missile and proxy capabilities as objectives.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth contradicted Trump by saying regime change was not the U.S. goal, though he acknowledged leadership changes in Iran. Secretary of State Marco Rubio added that the U.S. acted preemptively, fearing Iranian retaliation after an Israeli strike. The lack of a clear post-war plan has drawn sharp criticism in Congress. Most Republicans support Trump, while Democrats argue he has no concrete strategy and warn of a prolonged conflict.

Democratic lawmakers, including Adam Smith and Elizabeth Warren, questioned the legality and intelligence basis of the attack, calling it unconstitutional and dangerous. They also raised concerns about Israeli influence and the absence of congressional authorization for war.

The United States has claimed that more than 2,000 targets in Iran have been struck as part of its ongoing military campaign. White House spokesperson Caroline Levitt told reporters on Wednesday that hundreds of Iranian ballistic missiles and drones were destroyed, asserting that the US and Israel have now established full air dominance over Iranian airspace. She also said that 20 Iranian naval vessels were destroyed, including a submarine sunk near the Sri Lankan coast.

International analysts cited in the report said the continuing conflict between the United States and Iran has heightened tensions across the Middle East. They warned that the situation could impact global energy prices, trade, and security conditions.

Experts in Bangladesh noted that prolonged instability in the Middle East could affect the safety of Bangladeshi expatriate workers and the flow of remittances. Rising global oil prices could also increase domestic energy costs and put pressure on the national economy.

Spain has rejected a White House claim that it agreed to assist the United States in a military operation against Iran. According to Al Jazeera, the Spanish government dismissed the statement made by White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt, who said President Donald Trump had threatened to halt trade with Madrid before Spain allegedly agreed to cooperate.

Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares refuted the claim, stating that Spain’s position on the Middle East conflict and any attack on Iran remains unchanged. In an interview with Cadena SER radio, he reiterated that Spain would not allow U.S. bases in southern Spain to be used for any military action outside the framework of the United Nations Charter.

The Spanish government’s statement directly contradicts the White House’s assertion, creating a clear diplomatic rift between the two allies. Observers suggest that this disagreement could further strain U.S.–Spain relations in the near term.

The White House announced that Spain has agreed to cooperate with the United States in its military operation against Iran in the Middle East. The decision reportedly came after President Donald Trump threatened to halt all trade with Madrid. White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said Spain had clearly understood the president’s message and confirmed that coordination between US forces and Spanish authorities is now underway.

Earlier, President Trump had declared that he would end all trade with Spain. Just a day before that, Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares stated that his country would not allow the United States to use jointly operated bases in southern Spain for any attack outside the UN Charter. The Spanish government has not yet issued an official comment on the reported change in position.

The development marks a significant shift in Spain’s stance amid rising tensions over US military actions against Iran, though the extent of Spain’s involvement remains unclear.

Two drones were shot down near Baghdad International Airport in Iraq, according to an Iraqi official quoted by AFP. The incident occurred just hours after another drone attack targeted the same facility. Authorities confirmed that there were no casualties or significant damage from the latest incident.

A separate security source in Baghdad also verified the event. The airport complex includes a military base that houses a U.S. diplomatic facility and previously hosted troops from the U.S.-led coalition. The recurrence of drone attacks near such a sensitive site has drawn attention to the fragile security conditions in the area.

The incidents come amid heightened tensions across the Middle East, raising renewed concerns about regional stability and the safety of diplomatic and military installations in Iraq.