Questions have intensified over U.S. President Donald Trump’s handling of the Iran issue, particularly his fluctuating approach to negotiations and military threats. Analysts say that over the past two and a half months, Trump has created a situation that obscures reality and reflects internal contradictions. Despite repeatedly claiming that Iran is desperate for a deal, he has eased deadlines, downplayed Iranian provocations, and softened his tone after issuing threats, including a recent reversal on a planned assault on Iran’s Kharg Island.

Critics argue that Trump’s reluctance to escalate militarily has allowed Iran to exploit the situation, prolonging both the conflict and its economic fallout. The issue is now intersecting with the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, potentially giving Iran political leverage. Trump’s muted response to the downing of a U.S. Apache helicopter and his mixed messages about deploying troops have further fueled debate.

Experts warn that Trump’s flexibility and premature disclosure of plans are strengthening Iran’s bargaining position, while rising domestic inflation could deepen political challenges for Republicans ahead of the elections.