An opinion piece by Sardar Farid Ahmad, published on February 11, 2026, argues that the upcoming referendum in Bangladesh represents a decisive moment for the nation’s political and moral direction. The author frames the vote as a choice between ‘Yes,’ symbolizing reform and a new democratic order, and ‘No,’ which he associates with authoritarian continuity, fear, and moral bankruptcy. He contends that neutrality or silence in this referendum equates to supporting oppression and rejecting the sacrifices of those who fought for change.
The article contrasts ‘No’ as a return to past dominance, corruption, and dependence, while ‘Yes’ is portrayed as a commitment to institutional reform, judicial independence, free media, and national self-determination. Citing political theorists such as Hannah Arendt, Robert Dahl, and Juan Linz, the author links the referendum to broader questions of accountability and sovereignty. He emphasizes the role of youth voters, describing them as a transformative force unwilling to accept authoritarianism or external influence.
The piece concludes that the referendum is not merely a political exercise but a moral test of Bangladesh’s readiness to embrace reform and reject fear-based politics.
সরদার ফরিদ আহমদ প্রকাশ : ১১ ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২৬, ১০: ১৮ সরদার ফরিদ আহমদ গণভোট একটি সাধারণ প্রশ্ন নয়। এটি কাগজে ছাপা দুটি শব্দের লড়াইও নয়। এটি রাষ্ট্রের ভবিষ্যৎ নিয়ে জনগণের চূড়ান্ত অবস্থান। এই গণভোটে কেউ কেউ নীরব। নীরবতা এখানে নিরপেক্ষতা নয়। নীরবতা এখানে
The ‘1 Nojor’ media platform is now live in beta, inviting users to explore and provide feedback as we continue to refine the experience.
