Iranian President Mahmoud Pezeshkian has ordered the restoration of internet services across the country, according to Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency on Monday. The report did not specify when the connections would be fully restored. Internet access in Iran has been largely cut off for about 90 days following the outbreak of war involving the United States and Israel.

The communications ministry’s public relations chief was cited in the report, which linked the shutdown to a series of domestic and international crises. Iran began restricting internet services in late December 2025 after widespread anti-government protests erupted over rising inflation, currency depreciation, and a deepening economic crisis. By late February, as the conflict with the United States and Israel escalated into military attacks, the government almost completely severed internet connectivity.

The report did not clarify the timeline or conditions for the full restoration of internet access, leaving uncertainty about how quickly normal communication will resume.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated that Iran will not surrender to U.S. pressure or excessive demands. Speaking at a meeting with members of the country’s Chamber of Commerce on Monday, he said Iranian negotiators would secure the nation’s rights through diplomatic means. Pezeshkian emphasized that after failing on the military front, Iran’s adversaries have now shifted their focus to economic warfare.

According to the report, Pezeshkian accused the United States and Israel of launching an unprovoked war against Iran on February 28 by assassinating Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several senior military commanders. In response, Iran’s armed forces carried out retaliatory strikes over 40 days targeting U.S. and Israeli military facilities, causing significant damage. A two-week ceasefire agreement was later reached on April 8 through Pakistan’s mediation.

Pezeshkian added that despite the shift to economic confrontation, the government and private sector would overcome the current challenges through unity, coordination, and cooperation.

Iran is considering reopening the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz 30 days after a potential peace agreement to end hostilities, according to a report by Japan’s Nikkei citing a Middle Eastern diplomatic source. The discussions between the United States and Iran reportedly include plans for mine clearance operations in the strait within the first 30 days after the agreement.

Nikkei reported that once the mines are removed, ships from all countries would be able to pass freely and safely, and Iran would stop collecting transit fees. The talks come amid renewed US airstrikes in Iran, which the US military said targeted missile bases and boats allegedly laying mines in self-defense. Iran, however, stated that although some progress has been made in the negotiations, a final agreement is not imminent.

The developments highlight ongoing tensions and cautious diplomatic engagement between Washington and Tehran, with the future of the Strait of Hormuz remaining central to regional stability and global trade routes.

Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, has called for maintaining national unity and solidarity as the country faces attacks from the United States and Israel. In a statement released on May 26, 2026, he said Iran’s military and diplomatic efforts have demonstrated resilience under external pressure.

Zolghadr emphasized that preserving unity is as vital as achieving success on the battlefield and in diplomacy. He urged Iranians to avoid any words or actions that could weaken national cohesion, describing unity as another front in the ongoing struggle. According to him, collective effort will help the nation overcome obstacles and achieve final victory.

The statement reflects Iran’s focus on internal solidarity amid heightened tensions with the United States and Israel, highlighting the government’s message of resilience and collective strength.

On Monday, the United States and Israel jointly carried out an airstrike on an Iranian naval vessel south of Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz. According to Iranian state media, at least four people were killed in the attack. Iranian state television reported that the nearby port city of Bandar Abbas remained calm following the incident.

Citing Fox News, a senior US official stated that American forces targeted a surface-to-air missile site near Bandar Abbas after allegations that missiles had been fired at US warplanes. Sources quoted by Fox News described the military action as defensive and clarified that it did not signal the end of the current ceasefire.

The report, sourced from Middle East Eye, did not indicate any immediate escalation beyond the strike, and the overall situation in the region was described as stable.

Former US diplomat and Pentagon official Adam Clements stated that the recent US strike in Iran’s port city of Bandar Abbas will not cause the existing peace agreement to collapse. Speaking to Al Jazeera, he said the United States is likely gathering intelligence and assessing Iran’s maritime assets near the Strait of Hormuz.

Clements referred to reports that US forces targeted Iranian vessels allegedly involved in missile launch preparations and sea mine deployment. He suggested that the US acted based on such intelligence. Addressing US Central Command’s accusation that Iran was laying mines in the sea, he warned that such actions by Iranian forces could provoke a deadly response.

Clements added that Iran should not be surprised by the US decision to take this kind of military action, implying that the move was consistent with prior warnings and intelligence assessments.

The United States military carried out an airstrike in southern Iran, according to reports from a major US broadcaster cited by Al Jazeera. US Central Command (CENTCOM) spokesperson Tim Hawkins told Fox News that the strike was entirely defensive, aimed at protecting American troops from what he described as a direct threat from Iranian forces. The operation reportedly targeted two main objectives: missile launch facilities inside Iran and Iranian naval vessels attempting to lay mines in the Persian Gulf or nearby waters.

Iranian local media confirmed the occurrence of the strike, reporting loud explosions in the southern port city of Bandar Abbas. The semi-official Mehr News Agency stated that the situation in the area was now under full control. Hawkins added that the US military was maintaining maximum restraint during an ongoing ceasefire period while continuing to safeguard its forces.

Analysts cited in the report suggested that the sudden US strike amid an existing ceasefire could heighten regional tensions in the Middle East.

U.S. President Donald Trump has reiterated his demand that Iran immediately hand over its stock of enriched uranium to the United States or destroy it at an acceptable location. In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump referred to the material as 'nuclear dust' and said it should be eliminated either by transfer to the U.S. for complete destruction or through a coordinated process with Iran.

According to Trump’s statement, the destruction process could follow one of two paths: immediate transfer of the enriched uranium to the United States for destruction, or a joint and coordinated destruction effort within Iran or another acceptable site. He emphasized that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or a similar international body must be present as a witness to verify the process and its authenticity.

The report, citing Al Jazeera, did not include any response from Iranian officials or details on whether such a proposal has been formally communicated through diplomatic channels.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s attempts to pressure Iran into accepting Washington’s terms for a peace deal through threats and limited military actions have yielded little change, according to reports. Despite a ceasefire declared in April, the framework of the proposed agreement shows no major shift in Iran’s nuclear program or its core policy positions. A key element of the upcoming deal could involve reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and gas transport, which Iran has effectively blocked since late February.

Analysts note that while U.S. officials initially expected the reopening to lower global gas prices and weaken Iran’s bargaining power, Iranian forces have maintained control of the strait and resisted U.S. pressure. The U.S. Navy began a blockade near Iranian ports on April 13, redirecting several ships through alternate routes. Trump’s “Project Freedom” initiative to free stranded vessels achieved limited success before being suspended.

Experts suggest Iran’s leadership has grown more confident after the conflict, believing it has withstood external pressure while remaining firm in negotiations.

A source familiar with the matter said that the United States and Iran have reached an understanding regarding Tehran’s frozen financial assets through Qatar’s mediation. The discussions took place in Doha between a high-level Iranian delegation and relevant officials, where significant progress was reportedly made on key issues related to the seized funds.

According to the same source, the agreement represents a highly important development for Iran. The report suggests that there is a strong possibility of an official announcement of a formal deal between the United States and Iran as early as tomorrow. The information was originally reported by Al Jazeera and cited by the outlet.

If confirmed, the understanding could mark a notable step in addressing long-standing financial disputes between the two countries, though no further details about the terms or scope of the agreement were disclosed in the report.

Iran’s defense forces have shot down an enemy drone in the Gulf airspace, according to the state-run Fars News Agency. The report said the interception was carried out using Iran’s ‘Arash-e Kamangir’ interceptor drone over the waters of the Gulf. No information was provided about the drone’s origin or its mission.

Fars News Agency added that the technology used in the operation included undisclosed stealth capabilities. Citing unnamed officials, the report described the action as a clear and firm message from Iran. The incident has raised concerns that regional security tensions could escalate following the interception.

As of now, no official response has been reported from any other country regarding the event.

A high-level Iranian delegation has arrived in Doha, Qatar, to participate in peace talks aimed at ending the ongoing conflict with the United States. According to international media reports, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi traveled to meet Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani. Iranian state media said Ghalibaf is leading the delegation as Tehran’s chief negotiator. The visit is part of the diplomatic process initiated after the U.S.-Iran conflict began on February 28.

Iranian outlets Tasnim and Fars reported that Central Bank Governor Abdolnaser Hemmati is also part of the delegation. Diplomatic sources told AFP that the Doha meeting will review progress in the peace efforts. Reuters and AFP sources indicated that discussions will focus on two key issues: the situation in the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s highly enriched uranium program.

The talks are also expected to address the release of Iranian funds frozen abroad. Iranian media reported that a Qatari delegation recently visited Tehran to discuss the issue, while Pakistan continues to mediate between Tehran and Washington over the release of these assets.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei stated that while significant progress has been made on a potential memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the United States, it does not mean the two countries are close to signing an agreement. He clarified that once the MoU is finalized, discussions on nuclear issues and other key matters will take place within the next 60 days.

Baghaei emphasized that the negotiation process remains ongoing, with both sides continuing exchanges on various technical and political issues. His comments indicate that while dialogue is active, major hurdles still exist before any formal agreement can be reached.

The statement, reported by Al Jazeera, underscores that the diplomatic process between Tehran and Washington is still in progress, with the timeline for nuclear discussions dependent on the completion of the MoU.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei stated that Tehran currently has no plans for an official visit to Pakistan or for Pakistani mediators to travel to Tehran. He emphasized that Iran does not pay attention to any threats. Baghaei noted that recent developments were influenced by mediation efforts from Pakistan and other countries.

He warned that Israel might attempt to obstruct ongoing negotiations, saying Zionist forces are making maximum efforts to prevent an agreement. Baghaei added that countries advocating war and conflict, including Zionist powers, could influence U.S. officials. He also mentioned that once a memorandum of understanding is finalized, discussions on nuclear issues will follow.

According to Baghaei, while many aspects of a potential memorandum with the United States have been agreed upon, this does not mean that both sides are close to signing a deal. If finalized, talks on nuclear and other matters would take place within 60 days.

Iran continues to harbor deep distrust toward the United States despite ongoing discussions between the two countries, according to a report by Tasnim News Agency citing unnamed sources. The talks, facilitated by Pakistani mediators, have yet to produce a final agreement, with several conditions of the proposed deal still under dispute.

The source emphasized that even if a preliminary understanding is reached, it does not signify any change in Iran’s perception of the United States or confidence in the current U.S. administration’s commitment to its promises. The source further noted that Washington’s past record in negotiations has reinforced Tehran’s skepticism.

According to the report, Iran intends to closely monitor U.S. actions throughout any post-agreement process and retains the capacity to respond if Washington fails to uphold its commitments.