Iran has denied a claim by the United States that two American warships crossed the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement posted on social media platform X, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said the USS Frank E. Petersen and USS Michael Murphy had passed through the strait and were operating in the Arabian Sea as part of a broader mission. According to CENTCOM, the operation aimed to clear the strait of naval mines allegedly placed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and to ensure maritime security.

Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters rejected the US statement in a brief response. A spokesperson said the CENTCOM commander’s claim about the movement and entry of US ships into the Strait of Hormuz was strongly denied. The spokesperson added that all navigation and movement in the area are fully under the control of Iran’s armed forces.

The conflicting statements highlight ongoing maritime tensions between the two countries over control and security in one of the world’s most strategic waterways.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said that recent talks between Iran and the United States in Islamabad ended without an agreement due to what he described as excessive demands from the US side. He emphasized that despite the lack of a deal, diplomacy never ends and that discussions between the two countries had covered several issues, reaching understanding on some while differing on two or three key points.

Baghaei told Iranian media that the Islamabad meeting was the longest round of talks in the past year, lasting 24 to 25 hours. He noted that the discussions took place in an atmosphere of mistrust following a 40-day conflict, and that no one had expected a single meeting to produce a final agreement. He reiterated that diplomats must continue their duties in both war and peace.

According to Baghaei, the success of future negotiations depends on the sincerity and goodwill of the opposing side and recognition of Iran’s legitimate rights and interests.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said that negotiations with the United States in Islamabad made progress on some matters but failed to reach an agreement due to differences on two or three key issues. He disclosed this in an interview with Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB on Sunday, noting that while both sides agreed on certain points, significant gaps remained on others.

Earlier, U.S. Vice President JD Vance stated that the absence of a firm Iranian commitment to abandon nuclear weapons was a major obstacle in the discussions. Although Iranian state media had previously dismissed the possibility of further talks, Baghaei adopted a more flexible tone, emphasizing that diplomacy never ends and that no one expected all issues to be resolved in a single meeting.

Baghaei added that Iran would continue communication with mediator Pakistan and other friendly nations in the region. However, he did not clarify whether there were concrete plans to resume direct talks with the United States.

After 21 hours of negotiations, the first round of talks between the United States and Iran aimed at ending the Iran war concluded without any agreement. The discussions involved senior officials from both countries and were closely followed by regional stakeholders. In response, Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar called on both sides to maintain their commitment to the ceasefire.

In an official statement, Dar emphasized the importance of continuing to uphold the ceasefire pledges and expressed optimism that Iran and the United States would sustain a positive attitude in future discussions. He stated that Pakistan would continue to play an active role in facilitating dialogue and communication between the two nations.

Dar also thanked both parties for recognizing Pakistan’s efforts toward achieving a ceasefire and voiced hope that the two countries would move forward with goodwill toward lasting peace and stability in the region and beyond.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said that the United States and Iran have reached an understanding on several issues following extended discussions. The announcement came after US Vice President J.D. Vance stated that the two sides had failed to reach any agreement even after 21 hours of talks. Baghaei later told Iranian media that while progress had been made, two or three key issues remained unresolved.

He explained that the talks took place after a 40-day conflict and were held in an atmosphere of mistrust and suspicion. According to Baghaei, it was unrealistic to expect a full agreement in a single meeting, as no one had anticipated such an outcome. Earlier, he had emphasized that the success of the negotiations depended on the sincerity and goodwill of the opposing side and on recognition of Iran’s legitimate rights and interests.

The discussions mark a cautious step toward easing tensions, though the remaining disagreements suggest that further negotiations will be necessary before any comprehensive deal is reached.

Iran has stated that it is in no hurry to resume negotiations with the United States, saying the next move now lies with Washington. According to Iran’s Tasnim News Agency, citing reliable sources, Tehran has made reasonable proposals and expects the US to review them realistically. The source accused the US of miscalculations in the talks, similar to those made during wartime, and warned that no changes would occur in the Strait of Hormuz until a reasonable agreement is reached.

The report added that Iran remains patient and that no date or venue has been set for the next round of discussions. Meanwhile, US Vice President J.D. Vance left Pakistan after 21 hours of talks without reaching any agreement with Iran. Both sides have blamed each other for the failure to reach a deal, with Iran saying the negotiations stalled over two or three key issues.

The lack of progress underscores continuing tensions between Tehran and Washington, with no clear timeline for resuming dialogue.

Talks between the United States and Iran have ended without any agreement, according to reports on April 12, 2026. US Vice President JD Vance confirmed that the American delegation is returning home without a deal. A source close to the Iranian delegation claimed that the United States tried to secure through negotiations what it could not achieve on the battlefield.

The source stated that Iran refused to accept Washington’s ambitious conditions related to the Strait of Hormuz, its peaceful nuclear energy program, and several other matters. According to Al Jazeera and Iran’s Fars news agency, the outcome of any future agreement depends on whether the United States changes what Tehran described as its “unreasonable demands.” The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the unresolved key issues.

Both sides have reportedly blamed each other for the failure of the talks, while the Iranian delegation has already left Pakistan, where the discussions took place.

Recent talks between the United States and Iran concluded without a final agreement, though negotiations have not collapsed. Despite extensive diplomatic efforts and multiple rounds of proposals and counterproposals, both sides remain divided on several critical issues. US Vice President JD Vance stated that Washington has presented its “best and final offer” and is awaiting Tehran’s response.

The main sticking points include the US stance on the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran views as a “maximum pressure tactic,” as well as disputes over Iran’s nuclear program, regional influence, and economic matters. Iran has also demanded the release of its frozen assets, making it a central issue in the discussions. Sources indicate that while some progress has been made, it has not reached a decisive stage.

An unconfirmed report suggested a possible understanding involving Israel, under which it might avoid strikes on Beirut while continuing operations in southern Lebanon. Overall, the diplomatic process continues, but uncertainty remains high after the talks ended without a concrete deal.

US Vice President J.D. Vance announced that after 21 hours of continuous negotiations, the United States and Iran failed to reach any agreement. Speaking at a press conference in Islamabad on Sunday morning, Vance said the US plans to leave Pakistan without a deal, describing the outcome as bad news. He expressed gratitude to Pakistan’s prime minister and field marshal for their significant role in facilitating the discussions.

According to Vance, the United States had clearly presented its key conditions to Iran, but Tehran did not accept them. Responding to questions about Iran’s nuclear program, he claimed that the country’s nuclear capability had been destroyed, though he emphasized the need for stronger assurances to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons in the future.

Al Jazeera reported that Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Ismail Baghai rejected the US demands as excessive and illegal, asserting that the success of the talks depended on recognition of Iran’s legitimate rights and interests.

Iran has indicated that its planned peace talks with the United States could still be canceled if Washington fails to meet Tehran’s preconditions. The information was reported by a journalist from Iran’s state news agency IRINN, based in Islamabad. Iranian officials reportedly view withdrawal from the talks as a form of ‘strong diplomacy’ if their national interests, demands, and red lines are not respected.

According to Iran’s state television, the government currently places the highest emphasis on its own conditions and a lack of trust toward Washington. The report suggests that Iran considers itself to be in a favorable position and may proceed with further steps even without the planned discussions if its demands are not fulfilled.

The situation underscores ongoing uncertainty surrounding the talks, with Iran signaling readiness to act independently should its preconditions remain unmet.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has issued a stern warning against the passage of any military vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement released by its naval branch and published by the semi-official Tasnim News Agency, the IRGC said any attempt by military ships to cross the waterway would face severe consequences. The statement emphasized that the IRGC holds full authority to monitor and control the strait with complete intelligence oversight.

According to the IRGC, only civilian vessels meeting specific conditions are currently permitted to navigate through the strait. The force also rejected a claim made earlier by the United States military that two of its warships had successfully passed through the area, calling the assertion baseless. The warning underscores Iran’s firm stance on maintaining control over one of the world’s most strategically important maritime routes.

The IRGC’s declaration signals heightened tension in the region, particularly regarding military navigation rights and the enforcement of Iran’s maritime restrictions.

The first phase of direct talks between delegations from Iran and the United States has concluded, according to a report by Al Jazeera citing a close source in Pakistan, which acted as a mediator. The discussions marked a significant step in the ongoing diplomatic engagement between the two countries, though no details of the agenda or outcomes were disclosed.

Following the conclusion of the initial round, both delegations exchanged written messages, the source said. The Iranian delegation has since departed Pakistan, where the talks were held. The report did not specify the content of the messages or the next steps in the negotiation process.

While the talks have ended for now, the completion of this first phase suggests that further discussions may follow, though no timeline or official statement has been released.

According to Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency, discussions between Iranian and United States delegations have continued for more than four hours as of April 11, 2026. The report states that both sides took short breaks during the meeting for consultations and rest before resuming the talks. No official information has been released regarding the conclusion of the discussions.

The report, citing Al Jazeera, notes that it remains unclear whether the negotiations will extend further. The ongoing dialogue reflects continued diplomatic engagement between the two countries, though the specific agenda or outcomes have not been disclosed.

As of the latest update, neither side has provided details about progress or next steps, leaving the duration and results of the talks uncertain.

According to a source close to the Iranian delegation cited by Al Jazeera, the United States has agreed to return Iran’s seized funds or assets. The Iranian delegation joined the discussions following Washington’s decision to release the assets. The report indicates that this move fulfills one of the key demands in Iran’s ten-point plan.

Despite the reported agreement, there has been no official comment from Washington regarding the decision to return the assets. The discussions between the two sides were still continuing four hours after they began, according to the same report. The development comes amid broader regional tensions and diplomatic efforts involving both nations.

Further details about the timing or mechanism of the asset release were not disclosed in the report, leaving uncertainty about the next steps in the negotiation process.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has expressed support for the Iranian delegation participating in the ongoing United States–Iran talks in Islamabad. In a post on his social media platform X, he stated that the delegation in Pakistan would negotiate courageously to protect the country’s interests. Pezeshkian emphasized that public service would continue uninterrupted regardless of the outcome of the discussions and that the government would remain by the people’s side.

The talks between the United States and Iran are being held in Islamabad, with Pakistan acting as the mediator. The discussions come amid ongoing diplomatic efforts between the two nations, with both sides engaging through intermediaries. The Iranian president’s statement signals confidence in his delegation’s approach and underscores Tehran’s commitment to safeguarding national priorities during the negotiations.

The continuation of the talks and the president’s remarks suggest that Iran aims to maintain a firm stance while engaging diplomatically through Pakistan’s mediation.