Former national security adviser and strategic analyst Mark Feifel stated that Iran and the United States remain in the same positions where their negotiations began, with neither side shifting its stance. According to Feifel, Iran seeks the removal of all sanctions and blockades, along with an end to U.S. and Israeli military operations. In contrast, Donald Trump demands that Iran abandon enriched uranium, halt its ballistic missile program, and stop funding regional allied groups.

Feifel believes it is unlikely that Trump will initiate another major war against Iran, citing the recent declaration by Trump and his secretary of state that “Operation Epic Fury” has ended. Symbolically, this announcement removes the immediate prospect of a large-scale military campaign. Instead, Feifel expects Trump to intensify economic pressure, possibly through naval blockades and limited military actions near the Strait of Hormuz targeting Iranian speedboats, drone launch pads, and missile sites.

He added that Trump might tighten sanctions further or seek to involve European and Asian navies in protecting shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz, though his available strategic options now appear limited.

Iran has responded to a United States proposal aimed at ending the ongoing war, according to a report by Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB on Sunday. The broadcaster stated that accepting the US plan would amount to Iran surrendering to what it described as former President Donald Trump’s greed. The statement was released through IRIB’s Telegram channel.

IRIB said Tehran’s response emphasized the fundamental rights of the Iranian nation. Iran’s latest proposal reportedly highlighted the need for wartime compensation from the United States, recognition of Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, and the lifting of sanctions. It also called for the release of Iran’s frozen funds and assets.

US President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s response on Sunday, writing on his Truth Social platform that he had read the reply from Iran’s so-called representatives and found it completely unacceptable. No further details were provided about the content of either side’s proposals.

Strategic analyst and founder of Off the Record Strategies, Mark Pfeifle, has dismissed the ongoing discussions between Washington and Tehran as peace talks. Speaking on May 11, 2026, he described the exchanges as a contest of pressure, with both sides testing who will yield first. According to Pfeifle, the United States is applying pressure through sanctions, naval power, and blockades, while Iran is responding from within the Strait of Hormuz, creating uncertainty and disruption.

Pfeifle explained that the situation has become a waiting game for President Trump, who is reportedly observing how long Iran can endure the strain. He noted that Iran is facing a severe economic crisis, with the rial’s exchange rate falling to about 1.84 million per US dollar. Prices of essentials such as bread and cooking oil have risen by more than 200 percent, and overall inflation stands near 50 percent. A leaked US intelligence assessment, however, suggests Iran may withstand the current pressure for several more months.

Pfeifle concluded that Trump’s next move remains uncertain, leaving the future of the standoff unclear.

Iran has responded to a U.S. proposal aimed at ending ongoing hostilities, but President Donald Trump has rejected Tehran’s reply. According to semi-official Tasnim News Agency, citing a reliable source, Iran’s response emphasized the fundamental rights of the Iranian nation. The reply was delivered through Pakistan, which acted as a mediator between the two sides.

The source stated that Tehran dismissed Washington’s earlier plan, viewing it as an attempt to force Iran into surrendering to Trump’s excessive demands. The source further remarked that no one in Iran writes proposals to please Trump, asserting that the negotiation team works solely to defend national rights. The statement added that if Trump is displeased by this stance, it is considered a positive outcome.

The source also commented that Trump dislikes reality and continues to lose to Iran because of it. The report was originally cited from Al Jazeera, as reported by the outlet Amar Desh.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Dutch Foreign Minister Tom Berendsen held a telephone conversation, according to Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB. The discussion focused on bilateral relations and recent developments in the regional and diplomatic landscape.

IRIB reported on its Telegram channel that the two ministers exchanged detailed views on strengthening cooperation and maintaining regional stability. Before speaking with the Dutch minister, Araghchi also held a phone conversation with Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty on the same day. Tehran’s outreach is part of ongoing diplomatic efforts to ease tensions and promote peace in the Middle East.

The report emphasized that the dialogue between Iran and the Netherlands carries particular importance for enhancing bilateral cooperation and supporting regional stability.

A senior Iranian official described Tehran’s response to a United States ceasefire proposal as “realistic and positive,” according to comments reported by Al Jazeera on May 11, 2026. Speaking anonymously, the official said Iran’s reply addressed several key issues, including regional stability, the end of conflict in Lebanon, and the resolution of disputes with the US.

The official explained that Iran’s response also expanded the scope of discussions to cover the Strait of Hormuz, the country’s nuclear program, and the lifting of all sanctions. Tehran emphasized the need for a clear and guaranteed mechanism to remove sanctions and demanded specific international assurances for implementing any potential agreement with Washington. The response, the official added, was formulated based on Iran’s national interests and consultations with other regional countries.

Earlier, Iranian state media had characterized the counterproposal as a refusal to yield to “Trump’s greed,” while former US President Donald Trump reportedly rejected the proposal.

Iran has responded to a United States ceasefire proposal with a counteroffer emphasizing the need for a permanent resolution to the ongoing conflict. Officials in Tehran are being cautious about disclosing details of their response, which was sent through mediators on Monday afternoon. The 14-point proposal outlines a phased negotiation process, beginning with an agreement to ensure the war’s complete and lasting end.

After achieving consensus on ending the conflict, Iran proposes discussions on navigation and control mechanisms in the strategic Strait of Hormuz. The plan also hints at addressing the complex and unresolved issue of Iran’s nuclear file and its stockpile of highly enriched uranium in later stages. However, Iran’s nuclear and missile programs are currently not part of the negotiation agenda.

The response reflects Tehran’s focus on securing long-term stability and preventing any future resumption of hostilities, while maintaining control over key regional and strategic issues.

Iran has responded after former U.S. President Donald Trump rejected Tehran’s counterproposal to Washington’s ceasefire plan. The Iranian state broadcaster IRIB said the U.S. proposal amounted to Iran’s submission to Trump’s greed. The statement was released on IRIB’s Telegram channel on Monday.

According to the report, Iran’s counterproposal emphasized the fundamental rights of the Iranian nation. Tehran’s recent proposal called for U.S. compensation for war damages and reaffirmed Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. It also reiterated the need for lifting sanctions and releasing Iran’s frozen assets and properties.

The exchange highlights continued tension between Tehran and Washington over sovereignty, sanctions, and accountability for conflict-related losses, as reported by Al Jazeera.

Iran has rejected reports of an oil spill near Kharg Island, describing them as false and unfounded. Abbas Asadoroz, CEO of Iran’s Oil Terminals Company, said that after the reports surfaced, teams from the health, safety, chemical, and laboratory departments inspected the area but found no trace of pollution. He added that neither the International Maritime Organization’s MEMAC center nor Iranian authorities had received any pollution reports from the area.

Asadoroz criticized a post by the NGO Conflict and Environment Observatory on social media platform X, which claimed that an oil slick from an unknown source was spreading southward and was not being properly contained. Meanwhile, Jafar Pourkabgani, a representative from Bushehr in Iran’s parliament, also denied any oil discharge into the sea but suggested that the visible stains were likely waste and oil mixtures dumped from a European tanker, causing environmental harm.

The MEMAC center, a key regional body in the Persian Gulf, coordinates member states in responding to pollution incidents and strengthening preparedness for environmental emergencies.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated that any potential dialogue or negotiation with the United States does not mean surrender. In a message posted on social media platform X on Sunday, he warned that Iran would not bow to pressure. Pezeshkian emphasized that the purpose of any talks would be to protect the rights of the Iranian nation and uphold national interests.

Members of Iran’s parliament echoed similar sentiments. Ibrahim Rezaei of the parliamentary security committee said that time was turning against the United States and urged Washington not to sink deeper into difficulties. Deputy Speaker Nikshad added that the US was testing its fate against a strong Iran and must accept the consequences.

According to the report, Iran has given a limited response to the latest US proposal, which was sent through Pakistan’s mediation. The proposed framework reportedly focuses on achieving a ceasefire and reducing regional conflict, though details of the discussions have not yet been disclosed.

The United States has claimed that 58 commercial ships have been forced to change their routes as part of Iran’s naval blockade operations. According to the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the affected vessels were attempting to enter or leave Iranian ports. CENTCOM stated that the US naval blockade against Iran remains fully effective. The information was reported by Anadolu Agency citing CENTCOM.

In a message posted on social media platform X, CENTCOM added that since April 13, a total of 58 commercial ships have been diverted and four vessels have been disabled. The US said the purpose of these actions was to restrict maritime access to Iranian ports and maintain pressure at sea.

The report noted that tensions in the Gulf region have escalated following recent military friction between the United States and Israel. Despite a ceasefire brokered by Pakistan on April 8, no lasting agreement was reached, and the US later extended the ceasefire without specifying a timeframe.

Iran has responded to the latest U.S. proposal for a ceasefire, which was conveyed through Pakistan, according to Iranian state media reports published on Sunday. The Iranian Foreign Ministry had earlier stated that it would reply only after completing necessary reviews and reaching a final decision. The proposal, sent by the United States last week, aims to halt ongoing hostilities in the region.

According to Iran’s official news agency IRNA, the main objective of the current stage of talks is to end the regional war. U.S. media reported that the plan presented by the Trump administration consists of a single-page document containing 14 paragraphs. Former U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said he is awaiting Tehran’s response since the proposal was submitted.

The exchange of messages through Pakistan highlights the continued diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions, though the details of Iran’s response have not been disclosed in the report.

Iran has deployed domestically produced light submarines, known as the 'Persian Gulf Dolphins', in the strategic Strait of Hormuz to counter potential enemy warships. The announcement was made on May 10, 2026, by Rear Admiral Shahram Irani, commander of the Iranian Navy. He stated that the submarines are designed to detect and destroy hostile vessels and can remain submerged for extended periods in the area’s strategic waters.

According to the naval commander, the number of these light submarines is being increased based on existing threats, operational needs, and capabilities. The deployment was carried out as part of a mission honoring the martyrs of the Dena destroyer, during which the submarines surfaced before returning to deeper waters to continue their assigned operations.

The move highlights Iran’s emphasis on strengthening its maritime defense capabilities using indigenous technology, particularly in one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints.

Major General Ali Abdollahi, commander of Iran’s central military headquarters Khatam al-Anbiya, met with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, according to Iranian media reports on May 10, 2026. No photos or videos of the meeting were released, but reports said Abdollahi presented a detailed report to Khamenei.

The report covered the readiness of Iran’s armed forces, including the army, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), security and border police, the defense ministry, and the Basij forces. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had earlier mentioned a two-and-a-half-hour meeting with the Supreme Leader on May 7, though the exact timing was not specified.

Since reported U.S. and Israeli attacks on Khamenei’s residence, no audio or video of the Supreme Leader has been made public, with Iranian media only publishing his written messages.

Iranian military officials have indicated that Tehran may abandon its policy of 'strategic patience' following recent attacks and heightened tensions. They stated that the country's coastal areas and oil tankers have been targeted, prompting Iran to strengthen its military preparedness.

Officials warned that any nation planning attacks on Iran’s territory, energy facilities, or oil tankers would face severe consequences, though no specific country was named. A military spokesperson said that if adversaries take military action against Iran, they will encounter 'new weapons, new warfare methods, and new battlefield surprises.' He emphasized that Iran is ready to confront any potential conflict.

The spokesperson also cautioned that countries supporting U.S. sanctions against Iran could face difficulties in navigating ships through the Strait of Hormuz, signaling potential regional disruptions if tensions escalate further.