The ‘1 Nojor’ media platform is now live in beta, inviting users to explore and provide feedback as we continue to refine the experience.
US President Donald Trump has encountered significant opposition from Republican lawmakers in Congress for the first time in his second term. The dissent arises amid growing public anger and dissatisfaction over the ongoing war, according to a report from Al Jazeera’s Washington correspondent Patty Culhane. The report notes that pressure on the president is intensifying as members of his own party lose patience with his handling of the conflict.
Public sentiment across the United States is largely against the war, with most citizens viewing it as unjustified or unnecessary. Only the faction identifying as 'MAGA Republicans' continues to support the conflict as essential. The discontent has led ordinary Americans to flood congressional offices with calls expressing frustration and demanding accountability.
With midterm elections approaching, this internal party revolt marks Trump’s first major political challenge of his second term, driven by widespread voter anger and eroding support within his own ranks.
Trump faces internal Republican revolt amid public anger over ongoing war
U.S. President Donald Trump has instructed his representatives not to rush into finalizing a deal with Iran, a day after suggesting that an agreement was nearly complete. In a social media post on Sunday, Trump said discussions between the two sides remain constructive but emphasized that both parties should take sufficient time to ensure the deal is done properly. The proposed agreement reportedly includes a 60-day extended ceasefire, reopening of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, and a framework for future talks on Iran’s nuclear program.
According to U.S. media, the deal is not final, with key issues such as sanctions relief, release of frozen Iranian funds, and limits on Tehran’s nuclear activities left for later negotiation. The proposal has divided the Republican Party, with hardliners like Senator Ted Cruz calling it a “catastrophic mistake,” while others, including Representative Mike Lawler, have supported the administration’s approach. Trump reiterated that Iran must never develop nuclear weapons, though Tehran insists its program is peaceful.
Mediation efforts led by Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar have continued, with both sides reportedly working toward a memorandum of understanding that could pave the way for a final agreement.
Trump slows Iran deal talks, urges patience amid Republican divisions
The White House has taken a more cautious approach regarding a potential agreement with Iran, despite earlier optimism. Officials said several key issues remain unresolved and that reaching a final understanding could take several more days. While U.S. officials remain confident that a deal will eventually be reached, they acknowledged uncertainty about how quickly it can be finalized.
The situation mirrors earlier phases of the conflict, when the Trump administration claimed progress that Iran later denied. The United States has indicated movement toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz, but Tehran maintains that discussions have not yet reached that stage. The global economy is closely watching these developments, as the strait is vital for energy supply routes. A U.S. intelligence report cited by media suggested Iran could sustain the current situation for another three to four months.
Analysts are questioning how long the world economy can withstand elevated oil prices. President Donald Trump continues to assert that the United States controls the situation, while Iran counters that it also holds significant influence and capability in the ongoing crisis.
White House cautious on Iran deal as both sides differ on progress in Hormuz talks
U.S. President Donald Trump stated that any future agreement he makes with Iran would be a 'better and proper' deal, superior to the one reached under former President Barack Obama. In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump claimed that the Obama-era deal gave Iran large sums of cash and a clear path to developing nuclear weapons.
Trump added that his proposed deal would be the opposite, though he noted that the negotiations were not yet fully completed and that few people knew its details. He urged the public not to listen to critics who, he said, were commenting on matters they did not understand.
His remarks came amid criticism from political opponents following reports that the ongoing discussions did not include Iran’s nuclear program. Trump insisted he does not make 'bad deals' and argued that the Iran issue should have been resolved years ago.
Trump says any Iran deal he makes would be better than Obama’s agreement
The United States and Iran are reportedly close to signing a significant agreement aimed at ending their long-standing tensions and the ongoing war. According to a U.S. official, the proposed deal includes extending a 60-day ceasefire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, allowing Iran to freely sell oil, and restarting talks on its nuclear program. The agreement could be announced on Sunday, though last-minute setbacks remain possible.
Under the draft memorandum of understanding, both sides would commit to a 60-day renewable arrangement. Iran would clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz to restore international shipping, while the U.S. would lift port blockades and ease some sanctions to enable Iranian oil exports. The draft also includes Iran’s pledge not to develop nuclear weapons and to suspend uranium enrichment pending further discussions. Pakistan, alongside Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Egypt, and Turkey, has played a key mediating role.
The draft mentions a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, which has raised concerns from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. U.S. officials emphasized that any truce would not prevent Israel from responding to new Hezbollah attacks.
US and Iran near deal on ceasefire, Hormuz reopening, and nuclear talks
US President Donald Trump has posted a controversial image created with artificial intelligence on his social media platform Truth Social. The image depicts a US drone attacking an Iranian naval vessel, accompanied by the Spanish caption 'Adios', meaning 'goodbye'. The post quickly drew widespread discussion and criticism across social media platforms.
The post appeared at a time when international media reported on a possible agreement between the United States and Iran. Analysts cited in the source suggested that Trump’s post could reignite debate over ongoing tensions in the Middle East and the state of US-Iran relations.
No official explanation has been issued from Trump’s side regarding the post, and it remains independently unverified whether the image was entirely AI-generated.
Trump’s AI image of US drone attacking Iranian ship stirs online controversy
Amid the ongoing conflict with Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be softening his earlier hardline stance. Initially, he had insisted that only Iran’s unconditional surrender would be acceptable, but analysts now observe signs of flexibility in his position. The shift comes as the standoff and blockade in the Strait of Hormuz have disrupted global oil markets, driving up prices and creating economic pressure within the United States.
Although Trump has repeatedly claimed that the U.S. is largely energy independent, rising international oil prices are reportedly affecting the American stock market and broader economy. Diplomatic circles are also discussing the possibility that the U.S. might release some of Iran’s frozen assets as part of a potential settlement. Such a move could be politically uncomfortable for Trump, given his past criticism of the Obama administration’s decision to return Iranian funds during the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Analysts suggest that any similar step now could appear contradictory to Trump’s earlier political stance, adding complexity to his administration’s approach toward Iran.
Trump shows signs of softening stance on Iran amid oil price surge and diplomatic talks
During his recent visit to Beijing, U.S. President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as a “great leader” and “friend,” signaling a desire for closer ties with China. Trump returned home without visiting other Asian nations and offered no reassurance to regional allies, while suggesting he might reconsider arms sales to Taiwan. His remarks have raised concerns across Asia, particularly in India, about U.S. security commitments.
In response, Indian leaders arranged a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi and invited him to the White House. The two discussed deepening trade and defense cooperation. Rubio’s mission was seen as an effort to repair strained relations after Trump’s tariffs and his praise of Pakistani leaders. Analysts noted that Trump’s current approach contrasts sharply with previous U.S. policies that sought to strengthen India as a counterbalance to China.
Indian officials are now reassessing their strategic autonomy as Washington’s stance shifts. Some observers say both India and China are cautiously seeking stability in their relationship amid regional uncertainty.
Trump’s praise of Xi and shift toward China unsettle India and prompt diplomatic outreach
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the world could receive good news regarding a peace deal with Iran by the end of the day. He made the remarks on Sunday during a joint press conference in New Delhi, where he is on a four-day official visit. Rubio stated that the potential agreement would ease concerns over the Strait of Hormuz and initiate a process aimed at removing fears about Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
US President Donald Trump earlier said that most parts of the peace deal with Iran had been finalized following discussions with Israel and other regional allies. Trump described the ongoing talks as a memorandum of understanding related to peace, adding that the proposed agreement would reopen the Strait of Hormuz. However, Iran rejected Trump’s claim, asserting that Tehran would maintain control over the strategic waterway.
The statements from both sides indicate ongoing diplomatic efforts but also highlight unresolved tensions over control of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Rubio signals possible Iran peace deal announcement during visit to India
A shooting occurred near the White House on Saturday evening when an armed individual opened fire at a Secret Service security booth. The incident took place around 6 p.m. local time at the intersection of 176th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue. Secret Service officers returned fire, fatally wounding the suspect, who was later pronounced dead at a nearby hospital. One passerby was also shot, though authorities have not confirmed whether the injury resulted from the suspect’s gunfire or the exchange of shots.
The U.S. Secret Service confirmed the incident in a statement, saying preliminary findings indicated the suspect had concealed a weapon in a bag and drew it at a checkpoint. No Secret Service personnel were injured. At the time of the shooting, President Donald Trump was inside the White House, which was immediately placed under lockdown as a security precaution.
Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives posted on social media confirming the president’s safety. House Republican leader Steve Scalise expressed concern, noting that the nation was living in dangerous times. The event follows another shooting incident in Washington, D.C., less than a month earlier.
Armed suspect killed in White House shooting; Trump safe as lockdown imposed
Questions have emerged within the United States about what the country has actually achieved from its ongoing military operations against Iran. Despite active combat and sustained military pressure, even hardline Republican members of Congress are reportedly debating the extent of strategic results. President Donald Trump told reporters that Iran is now “very close” to what Washington wants in a peace agreement, adding in an interview with CBS that negotiations are improving daily.
At the same time, domestic criticism has intensified. Some Republican lawmakers have questioned whether the military campaign has delivered tangible outcomes. According to a New York Times report cited by Al Jazeera, intelligence assessments indicate that 30 of 33 missile bases along the Strait of Hormuz remain under Iranian control. Around 70 percent of Iran’s mobile missile launch systems and missile stockpile are also believed to remain intact.
Analysts suggest these findings show that Iran’s strategic capabilities have not been fully dismantled, raising sharper questions in Washington about whether the United States has met its objectives in the conflict.
US lawmakers question limited strategic gains from Iran military campaign
Former US National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard reportedly became increasingly marginalized within the Trump administration due to disagreements over foreign policy and military decisions concerning Iran and Venezuela. Appointed by President Donald Trump for her anti-interventionist stance and 'America First' outlook, Gabbard’s cautious approach to Iran’s nuclear program and opposition to aggressive strategies placed her at odds with senior officials.
Reports indicate that Gabbard was excluded from key national security meetings and decision-making processes, including discussions on potential military actions in Venezuela and joint operations with Israel against Iran. Her strained relationship with CIA leadership and reliance on a small circle of advisers further deepened her isolation within the intelligence community.
After months of internal tension and personal challenges, including her husband’s illness, Gabbard announced her resignation. Although Trump later praised her service, reports suggest that deep policy rifts over Iran and Venezuela defined her tenure and eventual departure.
Tulsi Gabbard resigned as US intelligence chief after disputes over Iran and Venezuela policies
US President Donald Trump said Washington and Tehran are 'very close' to finalizing an agreement, according to an interview with CBS News published on May 24, 2026. He noted that the situation is improving daily but declined to share details, saying he could not disclose information before informing the other party. Sources familiar with the talks told CBS News that the latest proposal includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, releasing some of Iran’s frozen assets in foreign banks, and continuing negotiations.
Trump claimed the potential deal would prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and that uranium enrichment issues would be handled satisfactorily. He emphasized that he would only sign an agreement that meets all US demands. CBS sources said Trump is still reviewing proposals, consulting advisers, and maintaining contact with Gulf leaders, including those in Saudi Arabia. US officials indicated that Trump is expected to hold phone calls with several Gulf leaders on Saturday, with Iran expected to dominate the discussions.
Trump warned that failure to reach a deal would bring severe consequences for Iran, while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said progress had been made and a new announcement could come within days.
Trump says US and Iran nearing final deal, warns of severe consequences if talks fail
Despite repeated claims of strategic victories in Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump now faces growing questions about whether he is losing the war. A Reuters analysis reports that after months of military pressure, Iran’s regional influence, control over the Strait of Hormuz, and nuclear program remain largely intact, casting doubt on Washington’s assertions of success.
Analysts note that while early U.S. and Israeli airstrikes damaged Iran’s missile stockpiles and naval assets, Tehran quickly retaliated by disrupting shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and launching attacks in Israel and Gulf states. Trump’s initial promise of achieving objectives within six weeks has not materialized, and diplomatic deadlock has deepened uncertainty. Former U.S. diplomat Aaron David Miller described the conflict as shifting from a short-term success to a long-term strategic failure.
The war has also triggered domestic political pressure in the United States, with rising fuel prices and declining popularity ahead of midterm elections. Meanwhile, European allies have refused to join the campaign, and China and Russia are reportedly studying U.S. military limitations. Analysts warn that the conflict could push Iran to accelerate its nuclear ambitions.
Trump faces rising doubts as Iran war drags on without clear victory
An Iraqi national trained by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has been arrested for allegedly plotting to assassinate Ivanka Trump, daughter of former U.S. President Donald Trump, as revenge for the 2020 killing of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani. According to The New York Post, 32-year-old Mohammed Baqir Saad Dawood al-Saadi had pledged to kill Ivanka and obtained a map of her Florida residence. He was detained in Turkey on May 15 and extradited to the United States, where he faces charges linked to 18 attacks or attempted attacks across Europe and North America.
Sources cited in the report said al-Saadi had close ties to Soleimani and his successor, General Esmail Qaani, and had worked with both the IRGC and Kataib Hezbollah. U.S. court documents show he coordinated multiple attacks, including bombings and shootings, and used social media to issue threats. Al-Saadi is currently held in solitary confinement at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center. The White House declined to comment on the alleged plot.
Investigators believe al-Saadi used an Iraqi government service passport to travel freely and evade scrutiny while planning attacks. His arrest may expose a wider network linked to IRGC operations abroad.
IRGC-trained Iraqi arrested for plotting to kill Ivanka Trump in revenge for Soleimani
The ‘1 Nojor’ media platform is now live in beta, inviting users to explore and provide feedback as we continue to refine the experience.