US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that China and Russia are not influencers in the ongoing Iran war. Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, he clarified that he has no message for either country, noting that both have long-standing diplomatic and trade relations with Iran. Hegseth emphasized that the United States’ focus remains solely on ending Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

The remarks come amid heightened tensions involving Iran, with regional developments drawing global attention. Hegseth’s comments sought to distance China and Russia from direct involvement in the conflict, underscoring Washington’s position that its dispute lies only with Tehran.

The statement suggests that the US aims to concentrate its diplomatic and strategic efforts on Iran’s nuclear program rather than broadening the conflict to other major powers.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has claimed that Iran’s president attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump, but Trump managed to overcome the attempt. Speaking at a Pentagon briefing alongside Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Kane, Hegseth said the United States had located and killed the leader of the unit allegedly responsible for the assassination attempt.

According to the report, in 2024, before that year’s presidential election, the US government filed charges against an Afghan national accused of involvement in an alleged Iranian plot to kill Trump. The US Department of Justice stated that 51-year-old Farhad Shakeri had been assigned to develop a plan for Trump’s assassination and was believed to be residing in Iran.

A criminal complaint filed in Manhattan court alleged that an officer of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard instructed Shakeri in September to create a surveillance and assassination plan targeting Trump.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has claimed that an American submarine sank an Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean using a torpedo. The incident reportedly left at least 80 people dead, according to Sri Lanka’s deputy foreign minister, who said the vessel was returning to Iran from an eastern Indian port. Hegseth made the announcement during a Pentagon briefing on Wednesday, describing the strike as part of ongoing operations against Iran.

During the briefing, Hegseth said the attack marked only the beginning of joint US and Israeli military actions against Iran, warning of larger assaults ahead. He added that American and Israeli forces expect to gain full control of Iranian airspace within days, less than a week after the conflict began. Hegseth also confirmed that additional US troops are being deployed to the Middle East to ensure victory.

He emphasized that the campaign remains in its early stages and that the United States will take as much time as needed to secure success, echoing President Trump’s position. The information was reported by Al Jazeera and the BBC.

Leaked Pentagon assessments reported by US media suggest that if the current strikes on Iran continue beyond 10 days, the United States could face shortages of key missiles. The US and Israel began coordinated attacks on Iran while diplomatic talks over Tehran’s nuclear program and regional activities were still underway. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes across the region, targeting Israel and US military assets in several Middle Eastern countries. The Pentagon reportedly cautioned President Donald Trump that a prolonged campaign would carry serious risks, including the high cost of replenishing munitions. Trump, however, insisted that US stockpiles were sufficient to sustain extended operations.

Analysts told Al Jazeera that interceptor missiles such as THAAD, Patriot, and SM‑3 could run low within weeks if the conflict persists. The US military’s Central Command confirmed the use of more than 20 weapons systems, including advanced bombers, drones, and missile defense platforms. Experts warned that manufacturing replacements takes months, and high-end interceptors are designed for limited engagements, not prolonged wars. Secretary of State Marco Rubio noted that Iran can produce far more offensive missiles monthly than the US can build interceptors.

Reports also indicate that the US has already depleted some ship-borne interceptors and suffered friendly-fire losses. Sustaining the campaign is expected to be extremely costly, with early operations estimated to have cost over a billion dollars.

Democratic Congress member Pramila Jayapal stated that there is no evidence Iran poses an imminent threat to the United States. She made the remarks after a House briefing on the Iran war, saying that no justification had been provided for an attack on Iran. Jayapal criticized the lack of a clear strategy regarding the conflict and noted that lawmakers were not informed about how long the war might last. She emphasized that congressional approval is required before initiating any war and warned of potential casualties.

Jayapal further argued that the justification for attacking Iran is weak and called for a congressional vote on the matter, insisting that Congress must decide on any war-related action. Meanwhile, the US-based Human Rights Activist News Agency (HRANA) reported that at least 1,097 civilians have been killed in Iran since February 28 amid ongoing violence. The report also claimed that 104 attacks occurred in the past 24 hours, targeting military bases, medical centers, and residential areas.

The developments highlight growing concern in Washington over the direction of US policy toward Iran and the humanitarian toll of escalating violence inside Iran.

Democratic Senator Chris Murphy has accused U.S. President Donald Trump of disregarding the American people and failing to follow proper procedures before initiating a conflict with Iran. Speaking after a congressional briefing, Murphy said the Trump administration had engaged in a war whose outcome remains uncertain.

Murphy stated that officials described the situation as an open engagement that has not yet fully begun but could lead to more American casualties. He added that the administration refused to rule out deploying ground troops. According to Murphy, this approach demonstrates contempt for the American public, as the administration believes it can wage one of the largest Middle East wars since Iraq and Afghanistan without a single congressional vote or debate.

Murphy’s remarks highlight growing concerns among lawmakers about executive overreach and the lack of congressional authorization for military actions in the region.

Five days after a joint US-Israel attack on Iran, questions remain over President Donald Trump’s motives and objectives. Initially, Trump and his administration said the goal was to destroy Iran’s nuclear program and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Vice President JD Vance reiterated this aim in a television interview. However, the administration’s reasoning evolved over subsequent days, with Trump later emphasizing the destruction of Iran’s missile and naval capabilities and the elimination of proxy groups in the region.

Trump subsequently suggested that regime change in Iran was necessary, telling Iranians they would take leadership after a transition. Yet Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth contradicted this, stating that regime change was not the United States’ goal, though he acknowledged leadership changes had occurred. Secretary of State Marco Rubio later argued that the attack was preemptive, as US forces would have become targets once Israel struck Iran.

The lack of a clear post-attack plan has drawn sharp criticism in Congress. Democrats accused the administration of acting without credible intelligence or a defined strategy, warning that the US could face a prolonged conflict.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s comments on Iran have stirred controversy ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, jointly hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Canada. In an interview with Politico, Trump said he did not care whether Iran participated, calling the country “badly defeated” and “in smoke.” Iran has qualified for the tournament, with group-stage matches scheduled in Los Angeles and Seattle, but rising U.S.–Iran tensions have raised concerns about the fixtures.

FIFA reiterated that all participating nations, players, staff, and fans would be welcomed and protected. The Athletic sought clarification from the White House, and Andrew Giuliani, director of the U.S. World Cup Taskforce, said any threats to the safety of millions expected to attend would be neutralized. The Iranian Football Federation did not respond to The Athletic’s request for comment, though its president, Mehdi Taj, earlier acknowledged concerns about the situation and said the sports ministry would take necessary steps.

FIFA’s secretary general had previously emphasized safety as the top priority, and a spokesperson confirmed that Iran’s participation status remains unchanged despite recent regional tensions.

The US Senate is scheduled to vote today on a proposal to limit the president’s authority to declare war. The debate on the bill is set to begin at 11 a.m. local time, with a vote expected at 4 p.m. If passed, the measure would restrict President Donald Trump’s ability to unilaterally initiate military action without congressional approval.

The proposal comes amid growing criticism that Trump ordered strikes on Iran without authorization from Congress. The move has triggered a heated debate over whether the president has the legal authority to undertake such significant military operations independently. According to The New York Times, some lawmakers have expressed opposition to Trump’s decision.

Iran has accused President Trump of acting to please Israel rather than serving the interests of the American people, further heightening regional and political tensions surrounding the issue.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has defended the administration’s position on the war with Iran, countering criticism over the justification for military action. He stated that President Donald Trump decided to attack Iran because he viewed it as a unique opportunity to achieve mission success. Speaking before a closed-door briefing for lawmakers on Tuesday, Rubio emphasized that the president was determined not to strike first, clarifying his earlier remarks that had drawn strong reactions.

Rubio previously said Trump believed Israel was determined to act and wanted the United States to strike Iran first to prevent potential retaliation against American bases and operations in the region. He reiterated that American troops would not be put at risk and argued that there was no way the Iranian government would acquire nuclear weapons under Trump’s watch.

Rubio’s comments have further fueled ongoing debate over the US administration’s Iran policy and military strategy.

US President Donald Trump announced that the US Navy will provide security for oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz if necessary. He made the statement on Wednesday in a post on the social media platform Truth Social. Trump also directed his administration to arrange insurance coverage for ships operating in the area.

In his message, Trump emphasized that the US Navy would begin protecting tankers through the strategic waterway as quickly as required. He added that the United States would ensure the safe global supply of energy under any circumstances.

The announcement comes amid heightened regional tensions, as the source also mentioned reports of US strikes on Iranian targets and other related incidents in the Middle East.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the Trump administration launched a preemptive strike on Iran to prevent potential attacks on American forces following Israel’s confirmed plans to strike Iran. He said Washington acted to destroy Tehran’s capabilities before it could retaliate, as Israel remained firm on its decision to attack in self-defense.

After a closed-door briefing on March 2 at Capitol Hill, sharp divisions emerged among US lawmakers. Vice President JD Vance told Fox News that the president’s main goal was to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, criticized the conflict as “Trump’s war” and a “strategy-less operation,” calling the administration’s justification inadequate. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Mark Warner warned that entering a war without a direct threat to the US set a dangerous precedent.

Reports indicate that Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in the ongoing airstrikes, with over 500 Iranian deaths reported. The US military confirmed six American fatalities. Republican leaders backed the operation as defensive, while Democrats sought to halt the war through a War Powers Resolution, though passage appears unlikely in a Republican-controlled Congress.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated that Israel’s planned attack on Iran influenced the timing of Washington’s own military strike, which later triggered broader conflict. Rubio said the United States had prior knowledge of Israel’s intentions and feared Tehran might retaliate against American interests in the region, prompting a preemptive US strike.

Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Stimson Center, criticized Rubio’s remarks, saying he effectively admitted that the United States had fallen into an Israeli trap. She noted that the US provides Israel with billions of dollars in military aid annually, reflecting their deep strategic ties. Grieco argued that there is now an urgent need to discuss where US and Israeli interests align and where they diverge.

Grieco made these comments in an interview with Qatar-based news outlet Al Jazeera, highlighting growing debate over the implications of US-Israel coordination in Middle East security policy.

U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to sever all trade relations with Spain after the country refused to allow its military bases to be used for an attack on Iran. Speaking to reporters following a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump said Spain had behaved disgracefully and announced that he had instructed U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Besent to halt all transactions with Spain.

Trump also sharply criticized the United Kingdom for taking a similar stance. His remarks indicate growing tensions between Washington and key European allies over military cooperation related to Iran. The statements were reported by Al Jazeera and published by the outlet Amar Desh on March 4, 2026.

The threat to end trade ties marks a significant escalation in U.S.–Spain relations, potentially affecting economic and diplomatic cooperation if implemented.

U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran’s new leadership wants to hold talks with him, but he stated that he will not engage in any negotiations with Tehran. In a social media post, Trump wrote that Iran’s air defense system, air force, navy, and leadership are finished, adding that Iran wants to talk but he told them it is too late. The statement was made public on March 3, 2026.

This is not the first time Trump has made such a claim. He previously asserted that after the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei, the country’s current leaders expressed a desire to negotiate with the United States, a claim that Tehran rejected. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani stated that Iran will not make any agreement with the United States.

The exchange underscores continuing tensions between Washington and Tehran, with both sides maintaining firm positions against renewed diplomatic engagement.