A Bangladeshi columnist argues that the armed forces are a source of state strength but should not replace civilian administration. The opinion piece warns that assigning routine administrative responsibilities to the military beyond disasters, emergencies or national crises could create long-term risks. It focuses on what the author describes as growing militarisation within civil bureaucracy and maritime institutions in Bangladesh.

The writer cites a November 2 research-oriented column by Golam Sohrawardy on the militarisation of public employment in South Asia. The article also challenges the leadership structure of Maritime University, alleging that despite its maritime identity, its vice-chancellor and pro-vice-chancellor positions have not been filled from outside the navy. The columnist rejects remarks characterising merchant-marine professionals as “boatmen” and stresses their technical training, operational responsibilities and academic qualifications.

The column further disputes claims that maritime boundary settlements constituted an unqualified historic victory for Bangladesh. It describes the settlements as arbitration in which all sides gained and conceded matters, and raises concerns about EEZ and continental-shelf “grey areas.” These are presented as potential future strategic issues if Bangladesh pursues offshore resources or develops a blue-water navy.